<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Secret of YouTube&#8217;s Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/why-is-youtube-so-successful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/why-is-youtube-so-successful/</link>
	<description>We architect information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; The History and Success of YouTube&#160;at&#160;ZooSeo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/why-is-youtube-so-successful/comment-page-1/#comment-155267</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; The History and Success of YouTube&#160;at&#160;ZooSeo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationarchitects.jp/why-is-youtube-so-successful#comment-155267</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] to Information Artchitects, the main reason why YouTube is successful is that YouTube is the &#8220;prototype of a democratic [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Information Artchitects, the main reason why YouTube is successful is that YouTube is the &#8220;prototype of a democratic [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rate your site against competitors &#171; digital extension of my whiteboard</title>
		<link>http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/why-is-youtube-so-successful/comment-page-1/#comment-96945</link>
		<dc:creator>Rate your site against competitors &#171; digital extension of my whiteboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationarchitects.jp/why-is-youtube-so-successful#comment-96945</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Marketing is a combination of Presence (how well is it pushed? How known is it?) and Self Dynamic (how well does it market itself as a product?).Interactive Content is a combination of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing is a combination of Presence (how well is it pushed? How known is it?) and Self Dynamic (how well does it market itself as a product?).Interactive Content is a combination of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey</title>
		<link>http://www.informationarchitects.jp/en/why-is-youtube-so-successful/comment-page-1/#comment-20077</link>
		<dc:creator>joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.informationarchitects.jp/why-is-youtube-so-successful#comment-20077</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Reliability&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I check out the boingboing.net rss feed in bloglines right now, I get a bunch of broken revver.com embedded video links, and it&#039;s not the first time that&#039;s happened.  I&#039;ve also had errors uploading videos to revver and other services.  YouTube, on the other hand, has had tremendous uptime and &quot;just works&quot; whether streaming or uploading video.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s also funny because, as far as I know, they are all running some variant of Adobe&#039;s Flash server to encode video, right? Is anyone talking about Adobe&#039;s (possibly) giant chunk of YouTube-based revenue?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reliability</p>

<p>When I check out the boingboing.net rss feed in bloglines right now, I get a bunch of broken revver.com embedded video links, and it&#8217;s not the first time that&#8217;s happened.  I&#8217;ve also had errors uploading videos to revver and other services.  YouTube, on the other hand, has had tremendous uptime and &#8220;just works&#8221; whether streaming or uploading video.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s also funny because, as far as I know, they are all running some variant of Adobe&#8217;s Flash server to encode video, right? Is anyone talking about Adobe&#8217;s (possibly) giant chunk of YouTube-based revenue?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

